<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dorkerrific &#187; Big Screen Talkies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dorkeriffic.org/category/big-screen-talkies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dorkeriffic.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Update on&#8230;Arrested Development!</title>
		<link>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2008/02/02/update-onarrested-development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2008/02/02/update-onarrested-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>potatobiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen Talkies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tee-Vee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkeriffic.org/2008/02/02/update-onarrested-development/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, they might actually make a movie! YAY!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, they might actually <a href="http://www.pagesix.com/story/big%2Barrested%2Bdevelopment">make a movie</a>! YAY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2008/02/02/update-onarrested-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DragonBall Z: Live Action??</title>
		<link>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/09/04/dragonball-z-live-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/09/04/dragonball-z-live-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>potatobiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen Talkies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkeriffic.org/2007/09/04/dragonball-z-live-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first, when I heard the speculation about a DBZ live-action film I thought &#8220;Cool!&#8221; and then I thought for about a second longer and went, &#8220;There is no way that can be done and be even remotely decent.&#8221; I was quite addicted to DBZ for some time, and my brother is still a huge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first, when I heard the <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2007/09/03/dragonball-z-film-to-begin-shooting-soon/">speculation about a DBZ live-action film</a> I thought &#8220;Cool!&#8221; and then I thought for about a second longer and went, &#8220;There is no way that can be done and be even remotely decent.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was quite addicted to DBZ for some time, and my brother is still a huge fan. I cannot fathom how anyone could make this work properly unless the focus was utterly and totally on the computer graphics involved in creating some glowing, flying guys blowing up weird alien bad guys a lot. Which is totally what they&#8217;ll do. *sigh* A cartoon can have weird pointy hair, eyebrows as big as their head, and can go &#8220;Ahhhhh!! Nnnnggg!!!&#8221; for like 10 minutes while sweating and shaking (which sounds totally not like what it is) and still be hot and awesome, but in real life, it can&#8217;t work. And surely anyone who would make this movie knows it, so they won&#8217;t do it. And then part of the essence of DBZ is gone. You just have a bunch of Asian guys leaping around blasting rays from their hands. If they could pick the right amount of goofy for Goku, the right amount of tiny/tough for Vegeta, and the right amount of humor (include Mister Satan?)&#8230;they still couldn&#8217;t get it right.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting pretty seriously bored and angry at movie makers lately. Come up with something NEW already. The 80s/90s aren&#8217;t everything. I already lived through all these things and didn&#8217;t need live action. But we get all these new-fangledy gadgets that can make reality look fake and fake look real and suddenly we have to redo everything.</p>
<p>The question is whether you&#8217;re really doing the series any justice. If you&#8217;re just in it for the money, then the answer is probably not. (This is why I like/hate Heroes. Tim Kring totally has no real love for the superhero genre and is totally money/hype motivated. And it shows in the marketing, casting, writing, everything. Disappointing. But what do I expect? What isn&#8217;t motivated by money?)</p>
<p>I also have worries about Speed Racer, which was a terrible cartoon anyway, but Matthew Fox is going to be in it, so I have no choice but to watch it. If it comes to the cheap theater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/09/04/dragonball-z-live-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Night 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/02/25/oscar-night-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/02/25/oscar-night-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>potatobiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen Talkies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkeriffic.org/2007/02/25/oscar-night-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know I have no qualifications to judge movies. PERIOD. Nevertheless, I&#8217;m a big mouth and here are my opinions. It&#8217;s not yet time for the Oscars, but I&#8217;m proud of me! I actually saw FOUR of the movies nominated for best picture! I didn&#8217;t even remotely have access to or time to view the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I have no qualifications to judge movies. PERIOD. Nevertheless, I&#8217;m a big mouth and here are my opinions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not yet time for the Oscars, but I&#8217;m proud of me! I actually saw FOUR of the movies nominated for best picture! I didn&#8217;t even remotely have access to or time to view the movies nominated for anything else.</p>
<p>The only best picture nominee I didn&#8217;t see was <em>Letters to Iwo Jima</em>. And no one else saw it either, so based on that alone, I don&#8217;t think it should win.</p>
<p><em>The Queen</em> was good, but really, it was a long movie about an old woman battling with tradition, duty, and her country&#8217;s demand for false emotional outbursts. OK, those are good themes. The only real problem is it wasn&#8217;t filmed all that interestingly, but Helen Mirren WAS spellbinding to watch. She does deserve a nomination. I didn&#8217;t see the movies the other Best Actress nominees were in, so I don&#8217;t know how she compared to them, but I imagine she deserves the Oscar.</p>
<p><em>Little Miss Sunshine</em> was adorable, hilarious, heartwarming, and the little movie that could. But really, Best Picture?</p>
<p>***SPOILER AHEAD HIGHLIGHT WITH CURSOR TO SEE***</p>
<p><font color="#FFFFFF">They stole the grandpa&#8217;s body from the hospital.</font></p>
<p>****SPOILERS OVER***</p>
<p>As soon as they did that, as loving as it was, the movie stepped on the realism line. Most critics keep saying that they managed to make that scene real, but I just don&#8217;t agree. I get that the family would continue with the pageant, but I just think the law would be sooo after them and that it logistically didn&#8217;t make sense. If it was a small flaw, I wouldn&#8217;t care much, but it&#8217;s part of the buildup to the climax, so it&#8217;s important. That said, I still think it makes sense it was nominated.</p>
<p><em>Babel</em> has a plot that spans the world and connects the stories through people and experiences, and lord knows I like those tenuous coincidences that put people in the place they are at that moment&#8230; Lost IS my favorite TV show! Each story was told with great acting and very interesting filmwork. But I do agree with one criticism I read about: The movie sets out to make us see just how language is a barrier, but it really doesn&#8217;t quite accomplish that. But maybe that&#8217;s a wrong interpretation.</p>
<p><em>The Departed</em>, I saw, I loved, I raved that everyone in this movie deserved a nomination. Yet, Mark Wahlberg is the only one that got one. You heard me. Marky Mark is up for an Oscar. I never saw <em>Blood Diamond</em> (I will in the next few weeks), but I guess the rules are an actor can only be nominated for one picture in one category. If so, Leonardo DiCaprio must have been AWESOME in <em>Blood Diamond</em> for him to nominated in that above <em>The Departed</em>. His character broke my heart throughout the entire movie.</p>
<p>I really want <em>The Departed</em> to win, but the story is a narrow Scorsese favorite, basically about some guys in the mob, so I can see why the globe-trotting plot of <em>Babel</em> might grab more votes.</p>
<p>Surely Martin Scorsese will finally get his Oscar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/02/25/oscar-night-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dark Tower Movies Finally Possible</title>
		<link>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/02/14/dark-tower-movies-finally-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/02/14/dark-tower-movies-finally-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>potatobiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen Talkies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkeriffic.org/2007/02/14/dark-tower-movies-finally-possible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen King really didn&#8217;t want to entrust his baby Dark Tower series to just anyone. Luckily, he and JJ Abrams are in talks! This on the heels of the new graphic novels. YAY!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen King really didn&#8217;t want to entrust his baby Dark Tower series to just anyone. Luckily, he and JJ Abrams are <a href="http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=18923">in talks</a>! This on the heels of the new <a href="http://www.stephenking.com/dt_07/">graphic novels</a>. YAY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2007/02/14/dark-tower-movies-finally-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clerks II: For ages 5 and up</title>
		<link>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/08/06/clerks-ii-for-ages-5-and-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/08/06/clerks-ii-for-ages-5-and-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 23:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>potatobiker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen Talkies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Life--I DO Have One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkeriffic.org/2006/08/06/clerks-ii-for-ages-5-and-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best parents award goes to: The people that sat in front of us in Clerks II. They brought their 5 year old who sat mesmerized through a movie in which every 3rd word is &#8220;fuck,&#8221; whether ass-to-mouth is okay is argued, &#8220;porch monkey&#8221; is used as an opener for the use of a dozen other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best parents award goes to: The people that sat in front of us in Clerks II. They brought their 5 year old who sat mesmerized through a movie in which every 3rd word is &#8220;fuck,&#8221; whether ass-to-mouth is okay is argued, &#8220;porch monkey&#8221; is used as an opener for the use of a dozen other racial epithets, a kid jacks off while wearing WWJD underwear, and a man blows then screws a donkey. This is the best movie for 5 year old children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/08/06/clerks-ii-for-ages-5-and-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Original Star Wars Movies to be Released on DVD</title>
		<link>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/05/04/the-original-star-wars-movies-to-be-released-on-dvd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/05/04/the-original-star-wars-movies-to-be-released-on-dvd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 16:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen Talkies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkeriffic.org/2006/05/04/the-original-star-wars-movies-to-be-released-on-dvd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot I don&#8217;t mind about the Star Wars Special Edition movies, but some of the changes bugged the hell out me. Everybody knows that Han shot first, not Greedo. What kind of crappy-ass bounty hunter is Greedo anyway that he can&#8217;t hit Han from three feet away? Come on, people. Anyway, there&#8217;s good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot I don&#8217;t mind about the Star Wars Special Edition movies, but some of the changes bugged the hell out me. Everybody knows that Han shot first, not Greedo. What  kind of crappy-ass bounty hunter is Greedo anyway that he can&#8217;t hit Han from three feet away? Come on, people.</p>
<p>Anyway, there&#8217;s good news. From <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Movies/05/04/film.starwars.reut/index.html">CNN</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) &#8212; The original theatrical versions of the first three &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; films are finally coming to DVD on September 12, two years after diehard fans blasted George Lucas for releasing only the digitally modified 2004 versions of the celebrated trilogy in a boxed collection.</p>
<p>This time, &#8220;Star Wars,&#8221; &#8220;The Empire Strikes Back&#8221; and &#8220;Return of the Jedi&#8221; will be available individually and appear on DVD exactly as they did in their respective theatrical runs in 1977, 1980 and 1983.</p>
<p>Each release, distributed by 20th Century Fox, will be a two-disc set that also includes the digitally tweaked 2004 edition.</p>
<p>The DVDs will be available only through December 31.</p></blockquote>
<p>Something tells me this will be one of the biggest money makers this Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/05/04/the-original-star-wars-movies-to-be-released-on-dvd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.J. Abrams Keeps on Trekkin&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/04/21/jj-abrams-keeps-on-trekkin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/04/21/jj-abrams-keeps-on-trekkin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen Talkies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorkeriffic.org/2006/04/21/jj-abrams-keeps-on-trekkin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a little surprised to learn that Paramount was undertaking another Star Trek movie so soon after the failures of both the movie Star Trek: Nemesis, and the UPN venture Star Trek: Enterprise. Another surprise was seeing that J.J. Abrams was helming the next movie (I&#8217;m all for this, as long as it&#8217;s up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a little surprised to learn that Paramount was undertaking another Star Trek movie so soon after the failures of both the movie <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/MOV/010/index.html">Star Trek: Nemesis</a>, and the UPN venture <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/ENT/index.html">Star Trek: Enterprise</a>. Another surprise was seeing that J.J. Abrams was helming the next movie (I&#8217;m all for this, as long as it&#8217;s up to <a href="http://abc.go.com/primetime/lost/index.html">Lost</a> quality or that of the first couple of seasons of <a href="http://abc.go.com/primetime/alias/index.html">Alias</a>). And the third surprise  came as I read that it would <strong>not</strong> be a <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/">Next Generation</a> movie, but would go back to the early days of Kirk and Spock. I&#8217;m all for this move, too, as long as they don&#8217;t make it stupid. I think ditching all of the recent incarnations of Trek, and doing something completely new, would be best. Star Trek needs to do something bold and different from anything we&#8217;ve seen in Star Trek so far.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/index.php?category=3&#038;id=35587">Sci Fi Wire</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Paramount has hired Mission: Impossible III director J.J. Abrams to write, direct and produce the 11th Star Trek feature film, aiming for a 2008 release, Variety reported. Damon Lindelof, who co-created Lost with Abrams, and Bryan Burk, who produces Lost, have also been tapped to produce the yet-to-be-titled feature.</p>
<p>The project will be co-written by Mission: Impossible III scribes Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci. It will center on the early days of original Trek characters James T. Kirk and Mr. Spock, including their first meeting at Starfleet Academy and first space mission, the trade paper reported. </p></blockquote>
<p>Now, who should play Kirk and Spock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dorkeriffic.org/2006/04/21/jj-abrams-keeps-on-trekkin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

